SubBundle — Sample Compliance Bundle (Hypothetical Project)

Bundle reference: SBL-SAMPLE-2026-001
Generated: 30 April 2026
SubBundle version: Stage 1 Concierge MVP
Output format: CAS V5 Building Safety section + CDM 2015 task-specific RAMS + BSR Application Information Schedule (AIS) structured fields, mapped to the Principal Contractor's evidence intake.

IMPORTANT — READ BEFORE USING

THIS IS A SAMPLE DOCUMENT FOR DEMONSTRATION PURPOSES ONLY.

Every firm, person, address, project reference, certificate number and trading entity named in this bundle is fictional. The project does not exist. The subcontractor does not exist. The principal contractor does not exist. This document is not a real submission to any Principal Contractor, the Building Safety Regulator, or any third party, and must not be used as such.

The bundle is produced by SubBundle (a trading service of Morgan and Co. Enterprise Limited) to demonstrate, to a prospective real customer, the structure, depth and quality of the compliance bundle SubBundle will produce from that customer's actual project inputs.

Technical content (RAMS hazard descriptions, control measures, regulatory references, product standards, scheme references) is drawn from current UK guidance (HSE L153, the Building Safety Act 2022, the Building (Higher-Risk Buildings Procedures) (England) Regulations 2023, the Common Assessment Standard V5 Building Safety section, BS EN 1366 series, BS 9999, BS 9991) and is technically credible, but every fact in this sample relating to this fictional project — competence of named installers, dates of certificates, supplier names, contractor sign-offs — is illustrative only.

SubBundle is a software vendor. It is not a regulated party under the Building Safety Act 2022, holds no dutyholder duty, and provides no legal, regulatory or safety advice. In a live engagement the customer (the subcontractor MD or the Compliance Manager) is responsible for reviewing, verifying, completing, amending and approving every output before it is used or submitted to any third party.

CUSTOMER SIGN-OFF PANEL — placeholder

In a real bundle, the customer would tick and date the box below before SubBundle marks the bundle as approved-for-submission. Without the tick, the bundle is watermarked "UNREVIEWED DRAFT — DO NOT USE."

[ ]   I, the named customer below, confirm that I have reviewed every section
      of this bundle, that I am satisfied the content is accurate and complete
      for my project, and that I approve this bundle for submission to my
      Principal Contractor.

      I acknowledge that SubBundle has drafted and structured this bundle from
      data I provided and from generally-applicable templates, that SubBundle
      has not provided legal, regulatory or safety advice, and that I — not
      SubBundle — am the responsible party for the content's accuracy and
      regulatory adequacy.

      Customer name:           ____________________________
      Role:                    ____________________________
      Firm:                    ____________________________
      Signature:               ____________________________
      Date:                    ____________________________

      Article 28 UK GDPR DPA reference: SBL-DPA-[customer-id]-v1
      SubBundle Terms of Service version: SBL-TOS-v1

SECTION 1 — PROJECT AND COMPANY PARTICULARS

1.1 Project particulars

1.2 Subcontractor company particulars

1.3 Trade scope and contracted package

1.4 Scope summary

The subcontractor (Lockford) has been appointed to deliver three discrete but related work packages within the Crayfield Court remediation:

1. Cavity barrier installation — installation of horizontal and vertical open-state and intumescent cavity barriers within the rebuilt façade cavity, levels 1–8, to maintain compartmentation between cladding zones in line with the design intent specified by the Principal Designer.
2. Fire-stopping at compartmentation junctions — sealing of all junctions between the new façade build-up and the existing structural slabs and compartment walls, to restore the fire-resisting line of compartmentation following ACM strip-out.
3. Fire-rated penetration sealing for M&E services — sealing of all new and existing M&E penetrations (electrical containment, water services, ventilation ductwork) crossing compartmentation lines, using third-party-tested systems appropriate to the host construction and the penetrating service.

All work is being delivered under the Construction Phase Plan owned by the Principal Contractor. The subcontractor's evidence flows upward into the Principal Contractor's Construction Control Plan, the project's Fire and Emergency File, and the Change Control Plan, and is referenced in the Principal Contractor's competence declaration to the Building Safety Regulator.

SECTION 2 — COMMON ASSESSMENT STANDARD V5 BUILDING SAFETY SECTION ANSWERS

This section answers the Building Safety section questions of the Common Assessment Standard V5, in the question structure published by Build UK and recognised by all Build UK member tier-1 contractors (mandatory completion required from 1 October 2025).

The answers below are tailored to this project (Crayfield Court) and this subcontractor scope (cavity barrier installation, fire-stopping, fire-rated penetration sealing) — they are not generic. In a live engagement, project- and trade-specific responses are required for the assessment to satisfy CAS V5.

Note on question references. CAS V5 question numbering is maintained by Build UK and the Recognised Assessment Bodies (CHAS, Constructionline, Achilles BuildingConfidence, Acclaim). The question stems below reflect the live V5 structure; specific numbering may differ between the RABs' implementation. Where this sample uses an indicative reference (e.g. BS-1.1) it is illustrative; the customer's CAS portal will surface the canonical numbering for their certified RAB.

2.1 Building Safety competence — organisational

BS-1.1 — Does your organisation have a documented building-safety competence framework that maps individual roles to the skills, knowledge, experience and behaviours (SKEB) required for those roles on Higher-Risk Buildings?

Yes. Lockford Fire Protection Ltd maintains a documented Building Safety Competence Framework (document reference LFP-BSCF-v3, last reviewed February 2026) that maps every site-based role to:
- the SKEB requirements drawn from PAS 8672:2022 (PCs and contractors carrying out building safety-critical work) and PAS 8671:2022 (Principal Designer competence — adapted for our Designer Risk Assessment input role);
- the FIRAS scheme requirements for the relevant discipline (cavity barrier installer, fire-stopping installer);
- supervisor-specific competence under the SSIP scheme (CHAS Premium Plus);
- the project-specific SKEB requirements requested by the Principal Contractor in the package competence schedule (HCL-CC26-CCS-PFP-03).

The framework is reviewed annually by the Director and the H&S Coordinator and updated when roles, regulations or standards change.

BS-1.2 — How do you evidence that personnel deployed to Higher-Risk Buildings hold the SKEB required for the role?

For each operative deployed to Crayfield Court, Lockford retains a personnel file containing:
- a current CV evidencing relevant experience (minimum 3 years for charge-hands; minimum 1 year for installers, working under direct supervision of a charge-hand);
- a current FIRAS individual registration card for the relevant discipline (cavity barriers, penetration sealing, or both as applicable);
- third-party-issued training certificates for: working at height (PASMA, IPAF as relevant), manual handling, fire-stopping product manufacturer-specific installer training (Rockwool, Hilti, Promat, as deployed on this project), CSCS card at appropriate level, asbestos awareness (UKATA);
- a behavioural assessment recorded annually by the line supervisor against the firm's behavioural standard (covers reporting culture, willingness to stop work, response to challenge);
- a project induction record signed on first attendance at Crayfield Court, evidencing the operative's awareness of project-specific hazards and procedures.

Personnel files are made available to the Principal Contractor on request and to the Building Safety Regulator if requested through the Principal Contractor.

BS-1.3 — How do you ensure that subcontracted or agency personnel meet the same SKEB standard?

Lockford does not currently sub-subcontract any element of the Crayfield Court package. All operatives on site are PAYE employees of Lockford Fire Protection Ltd. If sub-subcontracting were to become necessary (for example, for specialist intumescent firebatt installation in a configuration outside Lockford's existing FIRAS scope), the proposed sub-subcontractor would be assessed against the same Building Safety Competence Framework before deployment, and Helmsworth Construction Ltd would be notified for approval before any change to the personnel manifest.

BS-1.4 — How is competence verified at the point of deployment to a specific Higher-Risk Building project?

For Crayfield Court, every operative on the manifest has been verified against the project competence schedule (HCL-CC26-CCS-PFP-03) by the Lockford Contracts Manager before commencement. Verification consists of:
- confirming the FIRAS registration is current and covers the disciplines deployed;
- confirming all manufacturer-specific installer training is current (Lockford renews on a 24-month cycle, mandated by manufacturer schemes);
- confirming the project-specific induction has been delivered;
- confirming the operative's behavioural assessment is current.

A site competence register is maintained on site by the Site Supervisor and is updated daily with attendance and any operative-level deviations. The register is shared with Helmsworth's Package Manager weekly.

2.2 Building Safety competence — individual

BS-2.1 — For the named site supervisor responsible for this work, what is their competence evidence?

Site Supervisor for the package: placeholder — name to be confirmed at deployment. Indicative profile (representative of the seniority Lockford deploys to HRB packages):
- 9 years' experience in passive fire protection installation, the most recent 4 in supervisory roles on commercial and residential projects;
- FIRAS individual registration in cavity barriers and fire-stopping (current);
- SMSTS (Site Management Safety Training Scheme) certificate (current);
- First Aid at Work certificate (current);
- Manufacturer-specific installer training current for the four product systems specified for Crayfield Court (see Section 5);
- Behavioural assessment from the Director recording demonstrated willingness to stop work on safety grounds across two prior projects;
- CSCS card — Black (Manager).

A current CV and supporting certificates are held in the personnel file and are referenced in the Application Information Schedule (Section 4).

BS-2.2 — How do you ensure ongoing competence development?

Annual competence reviews are conducted by the Director and H&S Coordinator for every operative. The review identifies skills gaps relative to (a) current FIRAS scheme requirements, (b) current product manufacturer installer requirements, and (c) any additional Principal Contractor or BSR-driven requirements emerging through the year. CPD time is allocated within work hours; the firm budgets one supervised training day per quarter per operative, with project-loaded operatives prioritised when scheme renewals fall due.

2.3 Designer risk assessment input

BS-3.1 — How does your organisation contribute to the Designer Risk Assessment process for Higher-Risk Building work?

Lockford does not undertake principal design work and does not appoint Designers. Where the Principal Designer (Halmer Bowen Architects LLP) issues design information that requires installer input on buildability, sequence-of-work risk, or product specification adequacy, Lockford reviews the information, raises a Technical Query through the Principal Contractor, and provides a written response within the Principal Contractor's RFI process. This input is recorded in the Principal Contractor's design log and contributes to the Principal Designer's risk assessment update.

For Crayfield Court, the cavity barrier specification and the firestop product schedule have been issued by Halmer Bowen Architects LLP (drawing references CFC-PD-2026-FAC-04 to FAC-08; specification CFC-PD-2026-FIRE-SPEC-v2). Lockford has reviewed both, raised one Technical Query (TQ-LFP-001) on the interface between the new cavity barrier system and the retained existing internal compartment wall, and received a Principal Designer response (TQ-LFP-001-RESP). The response is incorporated into the RAMS (Section 3) and is referenced in the Application Information Schedule.

2.4 Mandatory occurrence reporting

BS-4.1 — What is your process for capturing and escalating safety occurrences during construction?

Lockford operates a written Safety Observation and Occurrence Reporting Procedure (LFP-SOORP-v2). Any operative may raise a safety observation through three routes: (a) verbally to the Site Supervisor (logged same-day); (b) via the dedicated WhatsApp Safety channel monitored by the H&S Coordinator; (c) through an anonymous physical post-box maintained on the welfare unit on every project. The Site Supervisor is required to escalate any observation that meets the BSR's mandatory occurrence reporting criteria (structural failure of an installed fire-protection element, design-vs-as-installed deviation that may compromise compartmentation, near-miss with potential to cause serious injury) to the Lockford Contracts Manager within 4 hours and to the Helmsworth Package Manager within 8 hours. Helmsworth, as Principal Contractor, then determines whether the occurrence triggers the BSR mandatory occurrence reporting threshold and, if so, makes the BSR submission within the statutory 10-working-day period.

A copy of LFP-SOORP-v2 is included in the Evidence Index (Section 5).

2.5 Change control

BS-5.1 — What is your process for capturing in-flight changes to specified work and feeding them into the Principal Contractor's Change Control Plan?

Where the as-installed work needs to deviate from the specification or the approved drawings — for example, where a planned firestop product cannot be installed because the actual aperture geometry differs from the drawing — Lockford operates a Change Notice procedure (template at LFP-CN-v2):

1. The Site Supervisor stops work on the affected element and records the deviation with measurements, photographs and a proposed alternative.
2. The Change Notice is submitted to Helmsworth's Package Manager within 24 hours.
3. Helmsworth assesses whether the change is "notifiable" or "major" under the Building (HRB Procedures) Regulations 2023 and determines the change-control pathway.
4. Lockford does not proceed with the alternative installation until written approval is received from Helmsworth.
5. The approved Change Notice is filed in the Fire and Emergency File and referenced against the affected drawing.

A blank LFP-CN-v2 form is included at Section 6 of this bundle.

2.6 Product traceability

BS-6.1 — How do you ensure that the products installed are the products specified, and that traceability evidence is captured?

For every product system installed under this package, Lockford maintains:
- the product datasheet and the manufacturer's installation manual current at the date of installation;
- the third-party fire test evidence — typically a UKAS-accredited test certificate to the relevant BS EN 1366 part (1366-3 for penetrations, 1366-4 for linear gaps; field-of-application supported by the EXAP report where extensions are claimed); for cavity barriers, BS EN 1363-1 fire-resistance and BS 8414 / BR 135 cavity-barrier-specific evidence as relevant;
- the batch/delivery records (delivery note, batch number cross-referenced to the manufacturer's certificate of conformity);
- an installation record per location, captured by the Site Supervisor or charge-hand at time of installation, comprising: location reference (drawing grid), product reference, batch number, installer initials, photograph of the completed installation before any concealment, and a sign-off by the charge-hand.

Installation records are uploaded weekly to Helmsworth's project Common Data Environment (Procore) and feed the project's Fire and Emergency File and the Golden Thread evidence required at Gateway 3.

The product systems specified for Crayfield Court and the relevant test certificates are listed at Section 5 (Evidence Index).

2.7 Suitability of training

BS-7.1 — How do you confirm that training is current, relevant, and from a recognised source?

Lockford accepts training certificates only from sources that are: UKAS-accredited (where relevant); endorsed by the FIRAS scheme; issued by a manufacturer with a published installer-training programme (Rockwool RWA Approved Installer, Hilti Firestop Specialist, Promat Approved Contractor, FSi Promat Trained Installer); or delivered by a recognised industry body (FIS, ASFP, BESA, CITB, IPAF, PASMA). Certificates from non-recognised sources are rejected and the operative is required to repeat training through a recognised route. The H&S Coordinator maintains a training matrix that auto-flags certificates approaching expiry within 90 days, allowing scheduled renewal without disruption to project deployment.

SECTION 3 — CDM 2015 TASK-SPECIFIC RAMS

This section contains two RAMS prepared in accordance with the Construction (Design and Management) Regulations 2015 (SI 2015/51), the Management of Health and Safety at Work Regulations 1999 regulation 3, and HSE L153 (Managing Health and Safety in Construction — Approved Code of Practice and guidance, current edition).

The HSE position is that a defensible RAMS must be site-specific and task-specific, that hazards must be identified with their specific control measures named (not generic statements), and that the method statement must be a usable working document for the operatives on site. The RAMS below reflect this standard.

Customer review point. In a live engagement, the customer (Lockford's Site Supervisor and H&S Coordinator) is required to read both RAMS, amend any element that does not match site reality, and approve the document by signature before issue. The signature panel is at the end of each RAMS.

3.1 RAMS — Cavity Barrier Installation at Floor Zone, Levels 1–8

3.1.1 Scope of work

The work consists of installing horizontal open-state cavity barriers (intumescent strip-faced mineral wool, 100mm cavity rated, 60-minute integrity / insulation per BS EN 1363-1) at every floor zone within the rebuilt façade cavity, and vertical cavity barriers at apartment-compartmentation lines. Installation is via mast-climbing work platforms on each elevation, working in pairs (one charge-hand, one installer per platform). Each barrier is mechanically fixed to the existing structural slab edge and to the new cladding rail support, ensuring full compression of the intumescent strip on both faces.

3.1.2 Reference documents and design information

• Principal Designer specification: CFC-PD-2026-FIRE-SPEC-v2
• Drawings: CFC-PD-2026-FAC-04 to FAC-08 (façade build-up sections, levels 1–8)
• Manufacturer installation manual: placeholder — to be cited from product schedule at Section 5
• Third-party fire test certificate: BS EN 1363-1 fire resistance + product-specific cavity barrier test evidence per the manufacturer's UKAS-accredited testing house
• HSE L153 (current edition)
• Working at Height Regulations 2005 (SI 2005/735)
• Crayfield Court Construction Phase Plan, Helmsworth Construction Ltd (current revision)

3.1.3 Hazard identification and control measures

3.1.4 Personal Protective Equipment — minimum

• Hard hat (BS EN 397)
• Safety footwear (BS EN ISO 20345 — S3 minimum)
• Hi-visibility jacket (BS EN ISO 20471 class 2)
• Cut-resistant gloves (BS EN 388:2016 level 4X42C minimum)
• Safety glasses (BS EN 166 level 1F)
• FFP3 respirator (face-fit tested) for cutting operations
• Personal fall arrest harness (BS EN 361) with energy-absorbing lanyard (BS EN 355) — for platform work
• Hearing protection (BS EN 352) when noise levels indicate >80 dB(A)

3.1.5 Training and competence required

• FIRAS individual registration in cavity barriers (current)
• Manufacturer-specific installer training for the deployed product (current within 24 months)
• IPAF 3a (mast-climbing platform) for the platform operator
• Working at Height refresher (current within 24 months)
• Manual handling refresher (current within 24 months)
• Asbestos awareness (UKATA) — given the existing structure context and the possibility of latent asbestos exposure during stripping; refresher current within 12 months
• Project-specific induction (delivered before first attendance at site)

3.1.6 Supervision

The Site Supervisor (Lockford) is on site whenever installation activity is in progress and has the authority to stop work for any safety reason without reference to the contracts manager. The charge-hand on each platform has authority to stop work on that platform. A weekly site safety walk is conducted jointly with Helmsworth's Construction Manager, recorded in the Helmsworth Site Diary.

3.1.7 Emergency procedures

• Platform emergency: Helmsworth's MEWP rescue procedure HCL-MEWP-RESC-01 — manual descent control on every platform, demonstrated in pre-start drill; nominated rescuer at ground level during all platform operations; secondary rescue route via adjacent platform if required.
• Fire on platform: withdraw both operatives via platform descent; isolate platform; raise alarm to Helmsworth's Site Manager and to the Fire and Rescue Service via 999 if extinguisher cannot control the fire within 30 seconds.
• Medical emergency on platform: descend platform to ground; first-aid response by site first-aider (rota maintained on welfare unit); ambulance via 999 if required; rendezvous point at the site main gate.
• First-aid provision on site: Helmsworth maintains the project first-aid provision; Lockford operatives include 2 First Aid at Work-trained personnel on every shift.

3.1.8 Toolbox talk

A toolbox talk derived from this RAMS is delivered by the Site Supervisor at the start of each working week and after any change to the RAMS. The toolbox talk record is signed by every operative present and retained in the project H&S file.

3.1.9 RAMS review and approval

Toolbox-talk-distribution panel. A 1-page operative-facing brief derived from this RAMS is issued separately as document LFP-TBT-CFC-001-v1.

3.2 RAMS (condensed) — Fire-rated Penetration Sealing for M&E Services at Compartmentation Junctions

3.2.1 Scope of work

Installation of fire-rated penetration sealing systems (intumescent firebatt, mortar collars, intumescent pillows, intumescent sealants) at all M&E penetrations crossing compartment walls, compartment floors and protected shafts, in accordance with the manufacturer's tested system and the field-of-application supported by the EXAP report. Each installation is matched to the specific penetrating service (cable bundle, single cable, copper pipe, plastic pipe, rectangular duct, circular duct), the host construction (concrete slab, masonry wall, plasterboard partition), and the required fire-resistance rating per the PD compartmentation strategy.

3.2.2 Reference documents

• Principal Designer compartmentation drawings: CFC-PD-2026-COMP-01 to COMP-04
• Principal Designer firestop product schedule: CFC-PD-2026-FIRE-SPEC-v2 Appendix B
• BS EN 1366-3 (test for penetration seals) — the firestop systems specified are tested to this standard with current UKAS-accredited certificates retained by Lockford and issued to Helmsworth at Section 5
• Manufacturer installation manuals (per system; see Section 5)
• HSE L153
• Crayfield Court Construction Phase Plan (current revision)

3.2.3 Hazard identification and control measures

3.2.4 PPE — minimum

• Hard hat, safety footwear, hi-visibility jacket as Section 3.1.4
• Cut-resistant gloves (BS EN 388 level 4X42C) under nitrile chemical-resistant overgloves
• Safety glasses (BS EN 166 level 1F)
• FFP3 respirator (face-fit tested) during mortar mixing
• Knee pads when working at low level

3.2.5 Training and competence

• FIRAS individual registration in fire-stopping / penetration sealing (current)
• Manufacturer-specific installer training for each deployed system (current within 24 months)
• Confined space awareness (current within 24 months) where plant rooms and risers are accessed
• All other items per Section 3.1.5

3.2.6 Supervision

As Section 3.1.6.

3.2.7 Emergency procedures

• Permit-to-work failure (live cabling): stop work immediately; isolate the area; notify Helmsworth's M&E foreman and Site Manager; do not resume until a fresh permit and a fresh isolation test are issued.
• Confined space emergency: entry attendant raises alarm; Helmsworth's confined-space rescue procedure HCL-CSR-01 in force; the Fire and Rescue Service is called via 999 for any rescue requiring atmosphere-controlled equipment.
• Skin contact with mortar: flush affected area with running water for minimum 15 minutes; medical attention at the site first-aider; refer to occupational health if irritation persists.

3.2.8 Approval

SECTION 4 — APPLICATION INFORMATION SCHEDULE (AIS) STRUCTURED FIELDS

The Application Information Schedule is the structured-data view of a Higher-Risk Building Gateway 2 application, recommended by the Construction Leadership Council (Guidance Note 04, July 2025; refreshed December 2025). The Principal Contractor (Helmsworth) is the AIS owner — Helmsworth assembles the project-level AIS from contributions made by every contractor and subcontractor in the package supply chain.

This section presents the AIS-aligned data fields that Lockford contributes for the Crayfield Court package. The fields below map into the Helmsworth project AIS at the bucket indicated.

4.1 AIS Bucket: Construction Control Plan — Subcontractor evidence

4.2 AIS Bucket: Fire and Emergency File — Subcontractor evidence

4.3 AIS Bucket: Change Control Plan — Subcontractor in-flight changes

4.4 AIS Bucket: Competence Declarations — Subcontractor input

4.5 AIS Bucket: Mandatory Occurrence Reporting — Subcontractor process

SECTION 5 — EVIDENCE INDEX

The following supporting evidence forms part of this bundle. In a live engagement, each item below is a discrete attachment uploaded by the customer at intake and packaged into the bundle. For this sample, each item is listed by category, by document reference, and with the relevant standard/scheme.

5.1 Subcontractor accreditations

5.2 Insurance

5.3 Personnel competence evidence (per operative)

For every operative deployed to Crayfield Court, a personnel file containing the following items is retained by Lockford and available on request to Helmsworth:

5.4 Product test evidence

For every product system installed under this package, the following evidence is held and submitted with the bundle:

5.5 Lockford internal procedures (referenced from Section 2 and Section 3)

5.6 Project-specific design references

SECTION 6 — CHANGE CONTROL NOTICE (BLANK)

Purpose. This page is the pre-formatted Change Notice that Lockford uses to capture in-flight deviations from the specification or approved drawings. In a live engagement, completed Change Notices are submitted to Helmsworth's Package Manager within 24 hours of the deviation being identified; Helmsworth assesses the change against the Building (HRB Procedures) Regulations 2023 thresholds (notifiable / major) and determines the change-control pathway.

LOCKFORD CHANGE NOTICE — LFP-CN-v2
====================================

Notice reference:        LFP-CN-CFC-_____ -v1
Project:                 Crayfield Court — cladding remediation
Package:                 HCL-CC26-PFP-03
Originator:              ____________________ (Lockford role: ________)
Date raised:             ____ / ____ / 2026
Time raised:             ____:____

1.  AFFECTED LOCATION
    Drawing reference:   ________________________
    Grid reference:      ________________________
    Level / elevation:   ________________________

2.  AFFECTED SPECIFICATION ITEM
    Reference (PD spec): ________________________
    Description:         ________________________

3.  DEVIATION IDENTIFIED
    Description of as-found condition:
    ______________________________________________
    ______________________________________________

    Photograph reference(s) attached:
    ______________________________________________

4.  PROPOSED ALTERNATIVE
    Product / system:    ________________________
    Test evidence ref:   ________________________
    Field-of-application support: ________________
    Rationale:           ________________________

5.  RISK ASSESSMENT
    Effect on compartmentation: _________________
    Effect on Designer Risk Assessment: _________
    Effect on competence evidence: ______________

6.  HOLD-POINT
    [ ] Work at affected location stopped (date/time): ____________
    [ ] No work at this location until written approval received

7.  HELMSWORTH REVIEW
    Received by Helmsworth Package Manager:       Name: ______________  Date: __________
    Notifiable / major change determination:      [ ] Notifiable   [ ] Major   [ ] Neither
    BSR change-control submission required:       [ ] Yes — by Helmsworth   [ ] No
    Approved alternative:                         [ ] Approved as proposed   [ ] Approved with amendment   [ ] Rejected
    Amendment / rejection reason:                 _____________________________________________
    Approver name:                                ____________________
    Approval date:                                ____ / ____ / 2026
    Signature:                                    ____________________

8.  CLOSE-OUT
    Installation completed per approved alternative (Lockford Site Supervisor sign-off):
    Name: ______________   Signature: ______________   Date: __________
    Photographic record of completed work uploaded to Procore CDE (folder reference): __________
    Filed in Fire and Emergency File (folder reference): __________

SECTION 7 — CUSTOMER SIGN-OFF PAGE

Purpose. This is the page the real customer (Lockford's responsible director or compliance manager) reviews and signs before the bundle is submitted to Helmsworth. The customer's signature here is the Stage 1 contract substitute for the SubBundle Terms of Service customer review, accuracy disclaimer, and approval.

7.1 Customer review confirmation

I, the named customer below, confirm:

• I have read every section of this bundle.
• I have verified the project particulars (Section 1), the company particulars (Section 1), and the package scope (Section 1) are accurate as at the date of my signature.
• I have reviewed the CAS V5 Building Safety section answers (Section 2) and confirm they accurately reflect Lockford's organisational and individual competence position for this project.
• I have read the two RAMS (Section 3) and confirm they are site- and task-specific to Crayfield Court, that the control measures are appropriate, and that the supervision and emergency arrangements are workable on this project.
• I have reviewed the Application Information Schedule fields (Section 4) and confirm the Lockford contribution is complete and accurate.
• I have reviewed the Evidence Index (Section 5) and confirm that every supporting document referenced has been provided to SubBundle and is current as at the date of my signature.
• I have reviewed the Change Notice template (Section 6) and confirm Lockford will operate the procedure as described.
• I am satisfied that the bundle, as a whole, is suitable for submission to Helmsworth Construction Ltd as Principal Contractor.
• I acknowledge that SubBundle has drafted and structured this bundle from data I provided and from generally-applicable templates, that SubBundle has not provided legal, regulatory or safety advice, and that I — not SubBundle — am the responsible party for the content's accuracy and regulatory adequacy.

7.2 Signature

7.3 SubBundle reference

7.4 Standard SubBundle disclaimer (recap)

This document was generated by SubBundle from data provided by the customer named above and from generally-applicable templates aligned to current UK Building Safety Act 2022, Building (Higher-Risk Buildings Procedures) (England) Regulations 2023, CDM 2015, HSE L153 ACOP and Common Assessment Standard V5 Building Safety section guidance. SubBundle is a software vendor. SubBundle is not a regulated party under the Building Safety Act 2022, holds no dutyholder duty, and provides no legal, regulatory or safety advice. The customer is responsible for reviewing, verifying, completing, amending and approving every output before it is used or submitted to any third party (including any Principal Contractor, Building Safety Regulator, or Safety Scheme in Procurement assessor). SubBundle accepts no liability for any consequence of using this document without the customer's independent professional review. The customer's signature at Section 7.2 is the customer's express confirmation that this review has been completed.

END OF BUNDLE — SubBundle Sample Compliance Bundle (Hypothetical Project), bundle reference SBL-SAMPLE-2026-001, generated 30 April 2026.